I must admit that I was a bit underwhelmed by the new features over Vista. Of course, anyone migrating from XP to 7 will notice a couple more improvements. The most obvious new addition when logged in is the revamped taskbar. Merging the functionality of the quick launch and the taskbar program buttons is a great idea, which I understand started out in Linux. Aero-peak, which is called by hovering over the show desktop button is kinda cool, but not really that useful. Aero Shake is a little more handy though, grab a window and shake it to minimize all other windows.
A really useful feature is Aero Snap, something that seems so obvious it feels like it should have been in Windows 98. Drag a window to the left or right side of the screen, and it fills the entire half of the screen – makes transferring files between two locations much, much simpler. Drag a window to the top to maximise it, but I prefer the good ol’ double-click the title bar option.
So those are the main aesthetic changes, another big improvement is performance. Starting up and shutting down is ridiculously fast. As in “wait, did that shut down properly?” fast. It’s awesome, and it’s the way technology should be going. The UAC prompt that pops up when there’s a potential security vulnerability also appears much quicker, and I’ve noticed appears less often than it did with Vista – so that’ll cheer a few people up.
There are many other improvements, but I reckon these are the main points. Since I’ve been using Vista for so long, I’ve felt it improve over time, and moving to Windows 7 isn’t much of a leap at all. The speed improvement is always welcome, and the new features are handy to have, too. But if Vista annoyed you, I can’t see Windows 7 being any better. My advice is to grin and bear it, Windows 7 is not a bad OS by any means.







